With an objective to enable continuous learning and progression for our learners, PremierAgile curated several learning articles in the areas of Agile, Scrum, Product Ownership, Scaling, Agile Leadership, Tools & Frameworks, latest market trends, new innovations etc...
This article is all about the difference between a User Story and Acceptance criteria in Agile methodology. A User Story refers to a requirement for any feature or functionality that usually consists of 2-3 lines. For example, the presence of a camera icon in the chatbox of WhatsApp to capture and send photos to your family and friends simultaneously.
On the other hand, the Acceptance criterion is nothing but the set of business terms and conditions that the functionality should meet to be approved by the stakeholders or Product Owner. For example, an error message Camera could not be started appears when you find some issue with starting your phone camera while chatting with your friend.
User Story, though not a Scrum term, plays a crucial role in Agile methodology as they shift the focus from software goals to a user-friendly description of desired potentials. Similarly, it is also crucial to implement a clear set of Acceptance criteria in the Agile methodology to include discussions with the end-users. Now let us find further how the User Story is different from the Acceptance Criteria.
A User Story is used to shift the focus from what to why you are building. It is made to begin a conversation between the individuals who would apply the story and the owner of the product, who aims to solve the underlying business issues rather than just offering a requirement. The goals of a User Story are as follows:
User Story Goals:
On the contrary, the acceptance criterion is a set of precise details where the User Story allows the team to decide the precise information of how something would be built. Have a look at the goals of Acceptance Criteria, which are as follows:
Acceptance Criteria Goals:
User Story:
The User Story is mainly intended to invite a conversation. There is no specific format for User Stories since they are not official Scrum tools, but there is a common structure for it, and it is As an
It is very important to understand the Acceptance Criteria as well as all other conditions as compared to a User Story. It is because if a requirement is vague or incomplete, it can be continued to the next Sprint. However, if the Acceptance Criterion is found to be missed, then it is not possible to release the User Story. You can look at some of the examples of Acceptance Criteria just below:
Have a look at this User Story:
As a user, I must be able to pay with the tap on my debit card so that it would take less time for me to check out the process.
This leads to the following acceptance criteria:
The problem with the above-mentioned Acceptance criteria is that they are full of vagueness. Hence, there is a popular method to describe Acceptance criteria, and it is nothing but Specification By Example. It can also be called Acceptance Test-Driven Development (ATDD) or Behavior Driven Development (BDD).
Note: User Story can sometimes be referred to as Product Backlog Item or PBI. In Agile Methodology, every User Story connected with its Acceptance criteria is verified against the Definition of Done to make sure that they are complete and correct.
The three C's of a User Story are card, conversation, and confirmation. This formula is established by Ron Jeffries, and it assists in maintaining a contract between the technical team and the business on the meaning of the User Story. Each C has its elaboration of a story, which are as follows:
Card:
The User Story is made using a simple statement that fits on a 3 x 5 index card; however, it should follow the role-feature-benefit format. For example,
As a trainer, I should be able to include a new course so that the new students would get attracted to it.
Conversation:
Even though the User Story begins with a simple and brief statement, you should make the details appear before you start working on the story as a team. An Agile team should involve certain things in the document, including the Development Team itself, such as Business Analysts, Testers, Developers, etc., and representation from the company (generally the product owner). Some of the examples of User Story conversation include:
Developer: Is there a need for a trainer to upload the courseware onto a website?
Product Owner: No, the trainer just needs to include details about the course that would be rendered. Also, advertise the feature in a way that students would get on an interest list. This story offers the trainer the potential to advertise a course.
Developer: What columns should be added?
Product Owner: Date and times, abstract, location, course title.
Like this, various conversations can be added, and the User Story will be updated by the team with the details they have collected from the conversation. Afterward, they would discuss how to implement and accordingly they carry out certain tasks to complete the story. Even though the User Story is written from the viewpoint of the user, the tasks for the developers are written by the Development Team, and they even involve the technical implementation information.
Confirmation:
As a Development Team, you should have a good understanding of how the function would operate in distinct situations, no matter if it is an error condition. You should receive a confirmation in regards to the Acceptance Criteria from the Product Owner. You can go through some of the criteria given below that should be fulfilled to complete and accept the story.
The interested button would be added to let the user enter a name, phone number, and email address. Every student's information would be stored and connected with the new course.
The Product Owner defines and writes a few of the criteria while he or she forms the Product Backlog. Then, the other details are further determined by the team at the time of User Stories discussions right after Sprint Planning. However, there are no specific conditions while selecting the individual responsible for writing the Acceptance Criteria.
If the client has enough knowledge of technical and product documentation, he or she can document them. During this time, the client prefers to negotiate the criteria while discussing with the team to get rid of mutual misunderstandings. Else, the Acceptance Criteria are formed by a Project Manager, Requirements Analyst, Business Analyst, or Product Owner.
You can even achieve a deep understanding of User Stories and Acceptance criteria by doing a deep study of them. Make a note that there is no course or tool obtainable in the market to carry out this. It is based on knowledge about the product, experience, and logical thinking. You can achieve this in any of the ways like talking to the Business Analyst, participating in pre-plan meetings actively, or studying on your own. If you make a lot of efforts, you can learn about the difference between a User Story and acceptance criteria in more detail.
Advanced-CSM Course Training Ghent, Certified Scrum Master Online Training Jacksonville, Leading SAFe Virtual Certification Training Raleigh, Advanced Certified Product Owner Training Brisbane, A-CSM Training Providence, CSPO Online Course San Antonio, Scrum Master Certification Boston, CSM Online Training Fayetteville, Scrum Master Online Course Adelaide, Certified Scrum Product Owner Certification Atlanta